New Nuremberg – Part 2

Please see our previous post about the Crimes Against Humanity

See Part 1: New Nuremberg – Crimes Against Humanity Click HERE

Click image for video

Humanity vs Inhumanity

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is an international trial lawyer who has successfully sued large fraudulent corporations like Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank. In 1993, he has been an attorney in Germany and was also admitted to the Bar in California in 1994.

“One reason for the government’s encroaching actions is the lack of judicial independence. The perpetrators of the crisis must be held legally accountable.”

Since July 2020, Reiner Fuellmich has become known for his worldwide network of lawyers and engagement with hundred experts from every field of science. They have collected undeniable evidence that the Covid pandemic is in fact a planned criminal operation. According to Dr. Fuellmich, a second Nuremberg trial may be needed, to prosecute all who are complicit in this unprecedented crime against humanity.

09-27 Reiner Fuellmich This week with Dr Sherri Tenpenny 00:00 / 52:00

click to be directed to audio interview

If you have enjoyed this interview just wait till you hear our exclusive Deep Dive with never before heard information.  Click HERE to sign up for Dr T’s Member Only interview now. 

You can find Reiner Fuellmich at the following sites:

Background of this action

The Corona Committee was founded in June 2020 on the initiative of four lawyers with experience in litigation. Since then, weekly hearings have been held to document and process the scientific, political and economic contexts surrounding the Corona events. We summarize the main findings of these hearings of now almost 200 experts from science and practice as follows:

1. As the sole diagnostic tool, PCR tests are not able to reliably detect infections or diseases. They also do not produce sufficient reason for this assumption as long as the CT value and the tested nucleic acids are not set strictly binding and sensible.

2. The lethality of Covid-19 has been proven (shown in meta studies by John P. Ioannidis, among others) in the range of the annual flu, which can also be fatal for certain age groups and people with previous illnesses.

3. The usefulness of lockdowns has not been scientifically proven sufficiently. This needs to be weighted neutrally from a technical point of view. However, there are numerous studies for the collateral damage caused by lockdowns.

4. The vaccines currently available against Covid-19 are only subject to conditional approval due to the assumed emergency situation, which also means that under “normal” circumstances they would never have been approved in this form. However, the emergency situation required for such an accelerated procedure does not exist anywhere in the world, as can be easily understood using the data from the official databases (RKI, ECC, CC, etc.). This prohibits the broad application of this experimental treatment, as is currently being propagated by politicians, especially among children and adolescents. We are pleased if you give us a short feedback as to whether you like to take part in the campaign. Then will get back to you as soon as possible.

One thought on “New Nuremberg – Part 2

Comments are closed.

Create your website with
Get started
%d bloggers like this: